Texas
A&M University-Commerce
Department
of Secondary and Higher Education
Overview of
Project
You are to create a
complete written pre-proposal for an unsolicited grant. The general purpose of this grant
pre-proposal will be to provide for the creation of a technology facility at a
school district or business. A potential
grant funding entity must be identified.
Optionally, upon approval of the instructor, the proposal may be written
in response to a specific Request For Proposal
(RFP)/Request For Application (RFA) or to address an identifiable need. You are urged to design a relevant and timely
proposal serving a useful purpose in your district, discipline, business, or
area of educational focus. The final
product must be a work of sufficient quality to submit to the entity for
funding consideration. The pre-proposal
can also serve as a framework for a future grant written in response to a
solicited grant. The primary focus of
the proposal must be on technology for use in an educational setting.
Required
elements of the proposal
Optional
elements of the proposal
Project Scoring
Important: The required
elements listed above will be a primary consideration in the scoring of the
project. Accuracy in following
submission instructions, meeting deadlines, professional writing quality, and
providing thoughtful evaluations will also be
considered.
Other
things to keep in mind
·
The
proposal should have a positive and professional tone of writing.
·
Don’t
use a proposal as a vehicle to simply voice complaints about a current lack of technology. Be honest about needs, but don’t “whine”
about them.
·
Write
professionally. Don’t use slang verbiage. Ya know whut ah mean?
·
Less
is more. Don’t add un-necessary “fluff.” Proposal evaluators want to know what’s
important. If you bore them with irrelevant
information, it is almost guaranteed to get your proposal tossed in the trash.
·
You
are trying to get the funding agency to make an investment in you and your
organization. You must convey that you
will act responsibly and professionally in administering any monies awarded.
·
First
impressions are critical. Many funding
decisions are made within the first paragraph of the proposal. If you want your proposal to be read and
seriously considered, you must capture the interest of the evaluator in the
Executive Summary. Most evaluators will
stop reading at this point if they don’t see evidence of a well thought-out,
worthwhile endeavor.
·
Never,
ever, make negative statements regarding previously received grants. This will send up red flags as an indication
that you may later speak negatively about the new funding agency.
·
Don’t
open a can of worms! Don’t bring up
issues that are indicative of more serious internal problems. You don’t want to go there!
·
Proposal are generally written to provide at least a partial solution to
an identifiable need. The need you
address must be able to be backed by quantifiable evidence. There must be qualified proof of need. Ways to build your case are with surveys,
test scores, formal evaluations, and other data gathered via valid research methodologies. (Data may be hypothetical in this class
project, but if you submit a proposal for real, you better have ALL of your
data together and available for inspection if requested by the funding agency.)
·
The
length of the pre-proposal will be approximately 5-7 pages to sufficiently address
the required elements. A more comprehensive
proposal may be slightly longer, but remember, don’t overwrite. It is highly unlikely that these elements could
be adequately addressed in fewer than 5 pages (double-spaced, 10pt font).
On-line
Resources:
Ø
SchoolGrants
http://www.schoolgrants.org/
…contains several samples
of successful PK-12 grant proposals, grant opportunities and writing
tips.
Ø
Texas
Education Agency (TEA) Grants Administration
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/grant/
Ø
TEA
Grantseeker’s Resource Guide
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/grant/seekers/
Ø
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Find (TIF) Board Grants
http://www.tifb.state.tx.us/
…TIF
grants may no longer a reliable source of funds. Other options need to be identified.
Site does identify current technology
standards.
Ø
Texas
Records And Information Locator (TRAIL) Funding Opportunity Search Page
http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/trail/grantsearch.html
Ø
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCFO/gcsindex.html
Ø
US
DOE Discretionary Grant Application Pkgs. for Currently Open Grant Competitions
http://www.ed.gov/GrantApps/
Ø
eFunding Solutions
http://www.efundingsolutions.com/
Ø
Guiding
Questions for Technology Planning
http://www.ncrtec.org/capacity/guidewww/gqhome.htm
Rev.