English 519
“The Real Thing”: American Realisms of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
Fall 2006
Monday 4:30-7:10
Dr. Karen Roggenkamp
Office: HL 229
Phone: 903-886-5251
Email: karen.roggenkamp@tamuc.edu
Website: http://faculty.tamuc.edu/kroggenkamp/English519.htm
Office Hours: Wednesday 11:00-12:00, Friday 11:00-12:00, and by appointment
I. Course Description
English 519 is a survey of late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century literary realism and naturalism, movements that, in varying degrees, were committed to “photographic truth” and “objectivity”—or “the real thing,” as many nineteenth-century Americans termed it. Throughout the semester, as we focus on prose fiction, we will work at defining precisely how authors of this era understood and represented “reality,” how they pushed open the boundaries circumscribing genteel literary culture, how they theorized such concepts as Social Darwinism and the urban jungle, and how they defined and redefined race, class, gender, and ethnicity.
By the end of the course, students should be able to:
identify the major tenets of such concepts as romanticism, realism, naturalism, and “local
color”
trace the development of literary realisms from an older, romantic tradition
prepare an original research paper that will be worthy of presentation at a professional
conference
II. Required Texts
The following works, listed below in the order we will read them, are available at university bookstores. You may also obtain them from other sources or use editions other than the ones I have ordered through the bookstore. For inexpensive books, take a look at Half Price Books, half.com, abebooks.com, and similar sources.
We will also be reading a number of critical essays and articles. You will be responsible for obtaining copies of these articles, either by copying the master copy on reserve in the Literature/Languages office (143 HL), or by downloading a copy from the “electronic reserves” section of the course webpage.
Required Texts:
Walt Whitman, “Song of Myself” (1855 version only)
Rebecca Harding Davis, Life in the Iron Mills
Louisa May Alcott, Hospital Sketches
Henry James, Daisy Miller
William Dean Howells, The Rise of Silas Lapham
Frank Norris, McTeague: A Story of San Francisco
Stephen Crane, Maggie: A Girl of the Streets
Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives
Upton Sinclair, The Jungle
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper”
Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, The Revolt of “Mother” and Other Stories
Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Charles Chesnutt, The Marrow of Tradition
Edith Wharton, The House of Mirth
III. Course Evaluation
Course grades will be based on a short bibliographic paper, a “conference paper,” submission of weekly class discussion questions, and class participation.
Discussion Questions 25%
Short Paper 20%
Conference Presentation 10%
Conference Paper (15 pages minimum) 30%
Class Participation 15% (Total 100%)
IV. Discussion Questions
Beginning with our next session, I will ask you to submit to the entire group, via email, two extended discussion questions on the reading assignment, or just some precise observations you have on the readings. These will need to be submitted no later than 10:00 p.m. on the Sunday evening before each class so that all members will have time to print them out, look them over, and think about them. Note that submission of these questions constitutes a significant portion of your grade!
V. Papers
a. Short Paper. Your first paper will hopefully lay the groundwork for your longer research paper. It will be an abbreviated bibliographic essay based on a small number (say 2-3) of critical essays written about one of the works on our syllabus which you anticipate using for your final research paper. A bibliographic essay is a narrative discussion—a sort of review—of criticism written about a particular topic. The essay doesn’t, however, just list secondary sources and paraphrase their major points. Rather, it draws particular conclusions about the critical materials by analyzing and evaluating them. The bibliographic essay compares, contrasts, and evaluates the critical works in question—it draws a picture of the secondary criticism published about a topic. In essence, it takes a critical look at key works of criticism.
b. “Conference Paper” and “Mini Conference” Presentations. The other major written requirement for this class involves one scholarly research paper, which will be a culmination of your studies in English 519. The research paper is to be a major piece of original research on any of the works we read for this class, or a related work. We will be reading critical articles throughout the class, and you can use these as a kind of model for the type of product your research paper needs to be.
The final draft of your research paper needs to be at least fifteen pages in length, but you will present a shorter version of your research in our class mini-conference, to be held the last two weeks of class. In this mini-conference, I will ask you each to read a seven or eight page paper (no more than fifteen minutes of reading time)—think of this as a trial run for turning your work in this class into an actual conference paper!
I will not grant extensions on papers or discussion questions unless merited by truly exceptional circumstances. Late work will only be accepted by prior arrangement between us and with documented proof of your inability to complete the assignment on time due to extenuating circumstances (scheduled school activity, significant illness, death in the family, etc.). The work may also be subject to a reduction in grade by 1/3 of a mark per day late.
VI. Attendance
Read everything, and come to class (on time!!!) prepared to talk about what you have read. Your attendance in class—and your arrival on time—is crucial and required, and a significant portion of your grade for this course will be based not only on attending class but on participating as well. According to the tamuc student handbook, “students are expected to be present for all class meetings of any course for which they are enrolled.” I will keep attendance, and you can expect your grade to be docked for unexcused absences. By departmental policy, students are permitted to make up work for excused absences—examples of excusable absences may include participation in a required or authorized university activity or a death in the immediate family. If you know you are going to be absent, please make arrangements with me in advance.
VII. Additional Statements of Policy
a. Instructors in the Department of Literature and Languages do not tolerate plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty, and acts of plagiarism can lead to immediate failure of the course. Instructors uphold and support the highest academic standards, and students are expected to do likewise. Penalties for students guilty of academic dishonesty include disciplinary probation, suspension, and expulsion (Texas A&M University—Commerce Code of Student Conduct 5.b[1,2,3]). Examples of plagiarism include but are not limited to cutting and pasting information directly from online sources, copying material from books without providing source documentation, taking essays wholesale from online sources, having someone else write a paper for you, and turning in work that you have already submitted for another class.
b. Students requesting accommodations for disabilities must make arrangements through the Academic Support Committee. For more information, please contact the Director of Disability Resources and Services, Halladay Student Services Building, Room 303D, 903-886-5835.
c. All students enrolled at the University must follow the tenets of common decency and acceptable behavior conducive to a positive learning environment. Standards of decency and acceptable behavior extend to the use of cell phones and instant messaging—please turn them off in the classroom unless you are awaiting a real emergency call for some reason. Additionally, please note that I enforce standards of inclusiveness in my classes. What that means is that I do not tolerate discrimination and disrespect in regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
d. You are responsible for reading and understanding all the information on this syllabus, as well as on any additional materials I distribute during the course.
VIII. Assignment Schedule
See the following table for a complete schedule of assignments. Please have each reading completed in time for class. Some slight changes may occur during the course of the semester. Please note that while I have tried to be reasonable in the amount of reading assigned each week, English-department graduate-level courses have a demanding reading load, by nature. I would advise you to budget time for your class work every day and to read ahead whenever you have time.
English 519: Schedule of Assignments and Readings |
|
8/28 (Week 1)
|
Introduction to course; what are realism and naturalism?
|
9/4 (Week 2)
|
Readings: Walt Whitman, “Song of Myself” (1855 edition) Miles Orvell, “Whitman’s Transformed Eye.” The Real Thing: Imitation and Authenticity in American Culture, 1880-1940. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1989. 3-29. Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 9/3 (preferably earlier) |
9/11 (Week 3)
From Romance to Realism |
Readings: Rebecca Harding Davis, Life in the Iron Mills (1861) Louisa May Alcott, Hospital Sketches (1863) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 9/10 |
9/18 (Week 4)
The Drama of Broken Teacups |
Readings: Henry James, Daisy Miller (1878-1879) Henry James, “The Art of Fiction.” (First published in Longman’s Magazine 4 (1884). Sarah A. Wadsworth, “Innocence Abroad: Henry James and the Re-Invention of the American Woman Abroad.” Henry James Review 22 (2001): 107-127. Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 9/17 |
9/25 (Week 5)
The Drama of Broken Teacups |
Readings: William Dean Howells, The Rise of Silas Lapham (1885) Critical readings from Howells Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 9/24 |
10/2 (Week 6)
Down and Dirty: Naturalism |
Readings: Frank Norris, McTeague: A Story of San Francisco (1899) Selection from “Zola as a Romantic Writer” Selection from “Frank Norris’ Weekly Letter” “A Plea for Romantic Fiction” “The Responsibilities of the Novelist” Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 10/1
|
10/9 (Week 7)
Down and Dirty: Naturalism |
Readings: Stephen Crane, Maggie: A Girl of the Streets (1893) Selections from Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives (1890) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 10/8
|
10/16 (Week 8)
Short Essay |
Short Essays due by 7:00 p.m. on Monday, 10/16. Class will not be held this week. |
10/23 (Week 9)
The Other Half |
Readings: Upton Sinclair, The Jungle (1906) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 10/22 |
10/30 (Week 10)
“Local Color” and Female Realists |
Readings: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “The Yellow Wallpaper” (1899) Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, selected stories, to be announced Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 10/29
|
11/6 (Week 11)
“Local Color” and Female Realists |
Readings: Kate Chopin, The Awakening (1899) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 11/5
|
11/13 (Week 12)
Reading Race: Realist Satire |
Readings: Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 11/12 |
11/20 (Week 13)
Reading Race: |
Readings: Charles Chesnutt, The Marrow of Tradition (1901) Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 11/19 |
11/27 (Week 14)
A Peek into Modernity |
Readings: Edith Wharton, The House of Mirth (1905) Barbara Hochman, “Highbrow/Lowbrow: Naturalist Writers and the ‘Reading Habit.’” Twisted from the Ordinary: Essays on American Literary Naturalism. Ed. Mary E. Papke. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 2003. Via email, submit two questions for discussion by 10:00 p.m., 11/26 |
12/4 (Week 15) |
Mini Conference |
12/11 (Finals Week) |
Mini Conference, continued |
FINAL EDITION OF CONFERENCE PAPERS DUE BY FRIDAY, December 15th at 4:00 p.m.
|